I Editorial Board
I Contact Us I Manuscript Submission I Indexing
Double-blind Peer review
After being received, each manuscript is primarily evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief.
- If the manuscript is not well-prepared as per JAVAR instructions, the manuscript is sent back to the corresponding author.
- If the content is not satisfactory, insufficient or does not match the scopes of JAVAR, the manuscript is rejected instantly.
- On passing the preliminary screening, the manuscript is sent to at least two expert peer reviewers.
A reviewer invitation from JAVAR is sent out by e-mail from the journal management system. Only the title and abstract of the manuscript are included in the invitation e-mail. After accepting the invitation, the reviewer gets full access to entire manuscript. Identities of the reviewers are kept confidential.
After completion of peer-review process and necessary revisions are done by the author, the revised manuscript is sent to the section editor(s) for critical checking and seeking the primary comments whether the manuscript can be accepted. Decision on a manuscript is finally made by the Editor-in-Chief considering the comments from the section editor and expert reviewers.
The decision may be any one of the following:
Accept (with or without editorial revision)
Suggest the authors for more revision
Reject with possibility of resubmission: The authors are informed that further work might justify a resubmit.
Reject, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problem.
Peer-review of an article is expected to be completed within 4 weeks. Decision by the Editor-in-Chief is given in approximately 5 weeks.
Last updated on 2 August 2018
If you are interested to
be a reviewer of JAVAR,
please send your CV (with a list of your top expertize and recent publications)
to the Editor-in-Chief for consideration.
supporter- Mohin Mahtab
Journal of Advanced
Veterinary and Animal Research